Socrates, Plato and Aristotle Essay Essay Example

Socrates, Plato and Aristotle Essay Essay Example Socrates, Plato and Aristotle Essay Essay Socrates, Plato and Aristotle Essay Essay Socrates was born in Athens about 470 BC and lived until 399 BC. he was a classical Grecian Athenian philosopher and is credited as one of the laminitiss of Western doctrine. An accurate image of the adult male. his life. and point of views are debatable because he did non compose any philosophical texts. everything we know is based on Hagiographas by his pupils and contemporaries†¦ this is what is known as the Socratic job. Socrates was subsequently tried and put to decease for â€Å"corrupting the young person and impiety† . Throughout his life Socrates neer wrote anything down because he believed cognition was a living synergistic thing and non to be written in a inactive authorship ( I bet the cyberspace would hold truly appealed to his love of synergistic treatments ) . so his typical method of philosophical enquiry consisted of oppugning people on their places and working them through inquiries until they reached a contradiction. therefore turn outing to them that their original averment was incorrect. Socrates most celebrated philosophical thoughts: The necessity of making what one thinks is right even in the face of cosmopolitan resistance. and the demand to prosecute knowledge even when opposed. which he did stop up paying the monetary value for these thoughts in the terminal. Socrates was unconcerned with physical or metaphysical inquiries ; the issue of primary importance for him was moralss and populating a good life. During his test and written in Plato’s â€Å"The Apology† he gave the thought that truth demands to be pursued by altering your place through oppugning and struggle with opposing thoughts. It is THIS thought of the truth being pursued. instead than discovered. that characterizes Socratic idea and much of our â€Å"Western† philosophical thought today. Plato: Plato was born in around 428 BC and lived until 348 BC. he was a classical Hellenic philosopher. mathematician. author of philosophical duologues. and laminitis of the Academy of Athens†¦ which was the first establishment of higher acquisition in the Western universe. Plato was a pupil to Socrates and was a instructor to Aristotle and was instrumental in puting the basis of Western doctrine and scientific discipline. He was a superb author and one the most influential writers in the history of Philosophy. The cardinal facet of Plato’s idea is the theory of â€Å"ideas† or â€Å"forms† . Plato believed the universe that appears to our senses is in some manner filled with mistake. or faulty. He believed there is a â€Å"perfect realm† . populated by entities otherwise known as â€Å"forms† or â€Å"ideas† that are ageless. changeless and in some sense related to the construction of our universe. Plato urges us to transform our values by taking to bosom the greater world of the signifiers and the faultiness of the life universe. He says we must acknowledge that the psyche is a different kind of object from the organic structure ; it does non depend on the being of the organic structure for its operation. This says that the psyche can so hold on the nature of the signifiers far more easy when it is non encumbered by its fond regard to anything in the physical universe. In Plato’s most influential duologue called â€Å"The Republic† he deals with his ideas about â€Å"forms† in a transition discoursing captives of the cave and his abstract presentation of the divided line. Worlds live in a universe of seeable and apprehensible things. The seeable universe surrounds us†¦ what we see. hear and see. this topographic point is a universe of alteration and uncertainness. The apprehensible universe is made up of unchanging merchandises of human ground such as mathematics ; this is the universe of world. This apprehensible universe contains ageless â€Å"forms† of things. For illustration the signifier or thought of a Canis familiaris is abstract and applies to all Canis familiariss ; this signifier neer alterations. If all the Canis familiariss in the universe were to disappear the signifier still would non alter. A Canis familiaris is a physical changing object and can alter or easy discontinue to be. but the â€Å"form† or â€Å"idea† neer alterations. Aristotle: Aristotle lived from 384 BC to 324 BC. was a Grecian philosopher and pupil of Plato and instructor to Alexander the Great. His composing covered non merely doctrine. but natural philosophies. metaphysics. poesy. theatre. music. linguistics. moralss. biological science and the list goes on. Together with Plato and Socrates. Aristotle is known to be one of the most of import initiation male parents of Western doctrine. His Hagiographas were the first to really make a comprehensive system of Western doctrine. Aristotle studied under Plato. but he basically disagreed with him on merely about everything it seems. He could non believe of the universe in such abstract footings as Plato did. he believed the universe could be understood through elaborate observation and cataloging of phenomenon. As a consequence of this belief. he wrote about everything from political relations to poetry. from anatomy to natural philosophies. Grecian doctrine up to this point chiefly dealt with the survey of cognition and inquiries of certainty ( i. e. suppose nil is existent? ) . Aristotle approached the inquiry by categorising based on their objects and the approx. certainty you could cognize those objects. For case. certain objects permit you to hold a cognition that is true all the clip. let’s usage geometry as an illustration. when we say a trigon is a polygon with three corners. it ever has that description and is true all the clip. this type of cognition is based on certainty and precise accounts. Other objects such as normal human feelings don’t license certainty. for illustration if you were to diss person you don’t cognize if they would be angry with you or non. This type of cognition is based on chance and imprecise accounts. As Aristotle put it. â€Å"One can non anticipate the same degree of certainty in political relations or moralss that one can demand in geometry or logic† .